ABAI Presentation · Attendee Resource Hub

Start with listening.
Build together.

Practical tools for compassionate caregiver collaboration—recognizing grief, understanding family context, and turning respectful conversations into shared action.

Conceptual foundations: caregiver relationships (Taylor et al., 2019); grief-related experiences (Alimohamadi et al., 2024; Coughlin & Sethares, 2017); parent collaboration (Wilson, 2023).

Prepared by Didiana (Didi) De La Osa, BCBA-D

From presentation to practice.

Choose one tool. Try it collaboratively. Ask what helped. Use what you learn to improve the next interaction.

01 / Your resource collection

Tools to bring into the room.

Open a guide to read, print, or save as a PDF. Start with the caregiver’s words and priorities.

Print the complete collection ↗

12 resources

Understand · Tool 01

Grief & Living Loss Quick Guide

A short guide to noticing context without assuming every family experiences grief.

Open & print guide
Connect · Tool 02

Grief-Responsive Check-In Guide

Five questions for an intake, transition, or routine caregiver meeting.

Open & print guide
Connect · Tool 03

Compassionate Communication Checklist

Observable actions to practice before, during, and after a conversation.

Open & print guide
Understand · Tool 04

Before You Call It Noncompliance

A context review before interpreting missed practice or attendance.

Open & print guide
Connect · Tool 05

Parent Values & Relationship Interview

Questions that connect family priorities to meaningful goals.

Open & print guide
Understand · Tool 06

Family Context & Cultural Questionnaire

A permission-based conversation about the family’s routines and preferences.

Open & print guide
Connect · Tool 07

Parent Well-Being Conversation Guide

A non-diagnostic check-in about support needs and service fit.

Open & print guide
Practice · Tool 08

Caregiver Interaction Observation Guide

Observe shared routines while respecting choice and context.

Open & print guide
Practice · Tool 09

Values & Action Reflection

An ACT-informed conversation starter for practitioners with relevant training.

Open & print guide
Practice · Tool 10

ACT Scope of Competence Reflection

A planning aid before adding an ACT-informed activity.

Open & print guide
Practice · Tool 11

Difficult Conversation Role-Plays

Three brief scenarios for rehearsal and feedback.

Open & print guide
Practice · Tool 12

Supervisor Observation & Feedback Sheet

Use behavioral skills training to practice caregiver collaboration.

Open & print guide

These newly prepared presentation companions are educational practice aids, not validated assessments. Source articles and books remain with their authors and publishers.

02 / Put it into practice

A conversation you can rehearse.

Use these four prompts as a flexible practice sequence. Follow the caregiver’s lead rather than treating the sequence as a script.

01

Listen

Pause, attend, and let the caregiver finish. Ask what they want you to understand.

02

Validate

Acknowledge the experience they describe. Avoid deciding how they should feel.

03

Clarify

Check your understanding. Ask permission before offering ideas.

04

Collaborate

Choose a manageable next step together and agree on how to review it.

Illustrative role-play / Missed home practice

“I know you want me to practice every day, but by the time we get home, I have nothing left.”

Before responding: what could you ask to better understand the caregiver’s experience?

The four-part conversation sequence and dialogue are newly written teaching examples informed by Taylor et al. (2019), not a named or validated protocol from that article. Rehearsal and feedback draw on behavioral skills training (Parsons et al., 2012).

03 / Continue the learning

The reading behind the practice.

APA 7 references with brief annotations. Links lead to source publications or publisher pages; access terms vary.

Alimohamadi, A., Ghasemzadeh, M., Fooladi, F., Abdolmohamadi, K., Killikelly, C., & Janghorbanian, Z. (2024). Living-loss: A narrative synthesis review of the grief process in parents of children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 77, e97–e107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2024.03.036

A narrative synthesis exploring grief-related experiences in the literature. Use it as context for asking individualized questions, without presuming that a caregiver identifies with grief or loss.

Bravo-Benítez, J., Pérez-Marfil, M. N., Román-Alegre, B., & Cruz-Quintana, F. (2019). Grief experiences in family caregivers of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(23), Article 4821. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234821

An empirical examination of caregiver grief experiences and perceived burden. Discuss the findings as context-specific evidence; they do not justify assigning grief to every family.

Coughlin, M. B., & Sethares, K. A. (2017). Chronic sorrow in parents of children with a chronic illness or disability: An integrative literature review. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 37, 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2017.06.011

An integrative review across chronic illness and disability contexts. Helpful for thinking about recurring support needs; its scope extends beyond autism.

Parsons, M. B., Rollyson, J. H., & Reid, D. H. (2012). Evidence-based staff training: A guide for practitioners. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5(2), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391819

A practitioner guide to performance-based staff training. Supports instruction, modeling, rehearsal, and feedback; the specific caregiver scenarios and observation sheet here are newly written educational examples.

Taylor, B. A., LeBlanc, L. A., & Nosik, M. R. (2019). Compassionate care in behavior analytic treatment: Can outcomes be enhanced by attending to relationships with caregivers? Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12(3), 654–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-018-00289-3

A conceptual paper describing relationship skills and ways to teach them. Use it to plan observation, modeling, rehearsal, and feedback; proposed benefits should not be treated as established causal effects.